An online website is an extremely effective way of reaching customers, but often businesses fail to make the most of their website. In this article we'll provide some tips on how you can improve website conversion rates.

One thing that you should be clear on before we go any further is that improving website conversion rates isn't something that only matters to e-commerce companies.

Websites can also form an important part of your company's customer retention strategy; the 'conversions' that you track can be customers who return to leave feedback, people who sign up for regular newsletters and promotions, or a whole wealth of actions that could prove useful to your business over time. Even if you only build good feeling with your website, the improved brand awareness can still lead to a sale further down the line.

Anyway, moving on swiftly, here are a few key aspects that can help you improve your website conversion rate - whether that means more customer interest or an actual customer sale:

Know your customer: A better understanding of the customer is essential to improving your conversion rates. Dig deep into your web analytics to track click patterns, user behavior, referral sites - anything you can find. It can all prove extremely useful in knowing just why people are on your site in the first place and why they are or are not taking the actions you want them to. Working out why people aren't converting in the first place is a pretty fundamental step.

Don't neglect self-promotion: There's a lot of competition on the web and users are notoriously impulsive in their browsing habits. It doesn't matter if you've got a great reputation if people haven't heard of you. Make sure that if you have good feedback, industry awards or some kind of proof that your business is the best at what it does, then anyone who visits your site will know it by the time they leave.

Be clear about what you do: People rarely throw money at things they don't understand. Well, things they don't think they understand (there is a small but important difference after all). You should clearly explain what you offer and what the customer would be doing when they 'convert' - and you should never, ever be unclear about anything that might affect your customer. People who feel in control are more likely to take action.

Commit to testing: Don't put half-baked strategies into action on your website. Using what you've learnt about your customer, seriously consider what you can do to improve your site before you take any action. Then once you've taken it, commit to it - see how rates are affected over time. You can experiment by all means but make sure that the experiment runs for long enough to be worth doing and make sure that it has a chance to make a change in the first place.

As you, all knew we shifted from Trac to Redmine for project management (issue/ticket tracking, source control management, mileposts). I am egger to tell few revealing facts experience at Redmine comparatively to th at of Trac setup my previous location.

I have concluded from the Trac mailing list and further discussion on the comments by some core developer is that the prime objective of Trac is to generate or build a basic static or groundling an extendable with the use of plug-in, which is a supreme mission statement. It poses but in it, as if once you are managing numerous Trac installations at a time, this scope turn out to be against you in an agile manner, though I miss few important things in Trac.

MULTIPLE PROJECTS

The initial ground for moving to Redmine was of the lacking sustained for multiple projects at Trac. I am sure you can hack Trac (see track- hacks) to let in multi project support, but still I do not prefer hacking. There were various discussion how (and if) Trac should enforce multi-project support concept: there lies no “out-of-the-box” resolution. I study something about Trac v2.0 supporting this, so I may suppose we will find that in around 2015 or so.

Whereas best thing about Redmine is, it does affirm multiple projects. The desegregation throughout the entire system is top-drawer. It allows you to create nuzzled subprojects and move issues/tickets from one to another project. Even for each project, one is free to assign different users and turn a few functionality (milestones, source control, time tracking) on and off which is additional icing to the sugar.

( Read more... )

What is one of the most challenging issues for bloggers who want good standpoint from search engine? It’s canonicalization, a process of converting the data with more than one representation into the canonical standard. Bloggers concern very much with this issue this process that will define the duplicate content of blogs or otherwise through the so-called algorithms work to sort the data repetition in order. Yet, this hot issue has been tactically responded through the redirecting the blogs from www to non-www or conversely.

In fact, the URL canonicalization is a long topic of discussion where people in common make a mistake to understand about. URL canonicalization is believed unable to go beyond www and non-www. Yet, the know-how basics are still out of the track. Let’s discuss this topic to get a precise insight on URL canonicalization in relation to an effort of redirecting www to non-www or vice versa.

A problem of 301 Permanent Redirect plugins

We normally find within the plugin directories of WordPress similar utility for redirecting www with 301permanent redirect. Actually, most of these plugins are not helping much to make URL canonicalization effects come away from our blogs, since one version include the functionality of Apache-based redirection, 404 monitoring, and many more. I do not need to mention the names of other remaining plugins due to the fact that they are superfluous. Furthermore, some of these redirecting options could distract the performance of your WordPress blogs.

The case is basically not the simplicity of the redirection tools available in the plugins. Using such plugin to remove the meta data header tags from the given standardized WordPress header doesn’t allow modifying the codes that have been set up. If only it is possible, we can simply upgrade and that will serve what we want from redirecting effort.

Here you a typical WordPres redirection taking the following process.

Web browser → Web server → WordPress(PHP) → MySQL

Since the data is within MySQL database, we need to through these steps and thereby every adds could delay the on-the-way process. The opposite redirection steps will be simply otherwise where the delay occurs in every single step.

When the web server is already optimised, it will neglect the necessity of using PHP to process static files and others. It means that you have already added your CPU and server with unnecessary memory usages. As a result, the effects of redirection are not only delayed-time use, but also the basic principle of performance wisdom itself. In short, we have to stay away from using the WordPress core plugins to redirect www to non-www and conversely. No way!

( Read more... )

The if/else statement

Has any ever said to you “if you work hard, then you will succeed in whatever you do”? And then what happens when you don’t work hard?, Well, you will fail it’s as simple as that. This is an example of an if/else statement.

• If you work hard then you shall achieve whatever it was that you had set out to do.
• Else, if you don’t work hard, then you will fail and shall not be rewarded for your lack of effort.

How does this translate into something that is useful for the php developers? Well think about this for instance:

Someone comes to your website and you want to ask this particular visitor if this is their first trip to your website. With an if statement this is easy enough to do. Simply have a statement to check off, “are you visiting this webpage for the first time.” If the condition statement is true then have them directed to the “insert your name” page, else let them view the website as they normally would because you have already asked them for their name in the past.


( Read more... )

Php tutorials / Learning Php

If you want to learn the premiere functions of a php, simple follow this short tutorial and everything should be clear. The prime goal of this tutorial is to teach you the reader the basics so that you can
• Customize the scripts you download, so that they fit your needs
• Begin to understand the workings of php, so that you can design your own model of the php projects
• Give you a base of php, so that your are deemed more valuable with your future employers

First you need to know what php stands for which is translated to (php hypertext preprocessor)

What is PHP?

It’s an html embedded scripting language mainly designed for producing web pages, created by Rasmus Lerdorf in 1995. The purpose of the language is to allow web developers to write web pages quickly with. In this PHP lessons you will see it.
This might be a good definition. Although it does contain a lot of computer talk, instead of these terms, just think of php as a powerful behind the scenes scripting tool that your web visitors won’t ever see.
When people visit your php webpage, your web server processes the code. It then sees what it needs to show such as content text and pictures and hides the computer language stuff such as the math calculations and file operation, then translates this into html style. Once the translation is finished it then sends the webpage to your visitor’s web browser.


( Read more... )

Ajax tutorial

This Ajax tutorial is a term for a type of programming made popular in 2005 by goggle.com and other big web developers. It loosely stands for Asynchronous JavaScript and xml, which sounds like a whole bunch of techno lingo to your average person. In plain words, in this tutorial we show that Ajax can be thought of as JavaScript on drugs.

Ajax- JavaScript on drugs

When JavaScript first came out, people loved all the cool things you could do with the web browser to make it a more user-friendly experience. You could do many things from validation, quirky popup messages; make cool web tools and much more. However, JavaScript had no way of sending information back and fourth between the web browser and the web server.

If you wanted to get any information from a database on the server, or to send user information to a server script like php, you had to make an html from to Get or Post data to the web server. The user would then have to click submit, and then wait for the server to respond, then a new page would load the results. I’m sure everyone has gotten slightly peeved for having to wait for especially slow websites.

Ajax attempts to remedy this problem by letting JavaScript communicate directly with the server, using a special JavaScript object such as xmlhttprequest. With this object, you could have JavaScript get information from the server without having to load a complete new page.


( Read more... )

When you think of the keyword this you probably assume it refers to the current instance of the class. This is true for most object oriented programming like C# and Java.
For example I could use the this keyword in C# like this:

class Cat {
string _name;
public Cat(string name) {
this._name = name;
}
}

In the above example you see this illustrated. In C# and Java, this always refers to the class instance.

So, knowing this you would probably assume the same would be true of object oriented programming in JavaScript and it's this keyword. This is, however, not the case. Like a lot of things about writing object oriented code in JavaScript, this behaves differently in some situations. this does not always refer to the class instance depending on how you use it.

function Cat(name) {
this.Name = name;
}

In the above object oriented programming example it works just like our C# example but look at a situation where things can go wrong if you are unaware of some rules.

( Read more... )

When you reading this story Zend Framework team may released the preview of the release 1.8.0. The final release would be released later in this month. This shows the how hard many providers worked for this release. This release also contains commanding components in it.

If you are using a Zend Framework user, then you have to try out for this preview release, it contains,

• 1.8 Preview Release (Zip)
• 1.8 Preview Release (tarball)

The general critique of Zend Framework is that it is not fulfilling the customary description of a framework. One of the definitions of framework by TheFreeDictionary and it says the following two possible properties of a framework:

Some points have to be there to support to provide a proved result. Particularly for something that is the construction stage.
A framework should consist of hypothesis, thoughts, principles and observations that support the method of screening realism.

This absolutely shows that ZF not providing adequate hypothesis or beliefs on how an software should be constructed. Although these arguments would be logically correct if you consider that it must follows the “principle over design” rule – this rule must be overridden with the Zend Framework. Our choice would be that coders know what they want to be in the application and they put a countless uses in the application.


( Read more... )

One of the most confusing aspects of CSS styling is the application of the font-size attribute for text scaling. In CSS, you’re given four different units by which you can measure the size of text as it’s displayed in the web browser. Which of these four units is best suited for the web? It’s a question that’s spawned a diverse variety of debate and criticism. Finding a definitive answer can be difficult, most likely because the question, itself, is so difficult to answer.

Meet the Units

“Ems” (em): The “em” is a scalable unit that is used in web document media. An em is equal to the current font-size, for instance, if the font-size of the document is 12pt, 1em is equal to 12pt. Ems are scalable in nature, so 2em would equal 24pt, .5em would equal 6pt, etc. Ems are becoming increasingly popular in web documents due to scalability and their mobile-device-friendly nature.
Pixels (px): Pixels are fixed-size units that are used in screen media (i.e. to be read on the computer screen). One pixel is equal to one dot on the computer screen (the smallest division of your screen’s resolution). Many web designers use pixel units in web documents in order to produce a pixel-perfect representation of their site as it is rendered in the browser. One problem with the pixel unit is that it does not scale upward for visually-impaired readers or downward to fit mobile devices.
Points (pt): Points are traditionally used in print media (anything that is to be printed on paper, etc.). One point is equal to 1/72 of an inch. Points are much like pixels, in that they are fixed-size units and cannot scale in size.
Percent (%): The percent unit is much like the “em” unit, save for a few fundamental differences. First and foremost, the current font-size is equal to 100% (i.e. 12pt = 100%). While using the percent unit, your text remains fully scalable for mobile devices and for accessibility.

So, What’s the Difference?

( Read more... )

Steve Souders is currently doing more to improve the performance of web pages and web browsers than anyone else out there. When he worked at Yahoo! he was responsible for YSlow (a great tool for measuring ways to improve the performance of your site) and he wrote the book on improving page performance: High Performance Web Sites. Now he works for Google but much of what he's up to is the same: Making web pages load faster.

I've been really excited about one of his recent project releases: UA Profiler. The profiler is a tool that you can run in your browser to determine the status of a number of network-performance-specific features that tie heavily to browser page load performance.

Here's a look at the current breakdown:



We can see Firefox 3.1 taking a lead, fixing 9 out of 11 of the issues tested for. Firefox 3, Chrome, and Safari 4 all come after with 8 fixed. Firefox 2, Safari 3.1, and IE 8 next at 7. Those numbers help to give you an overall feel of the page load performance that you'll see in a browser. (Naturally these tests don't take any rendering or JavaScript performance numbers into account but network performance generally trumps their total runtime anyway.)


( Read more... )